|
|
|
|
Ross DeVol and Lorna Wallace, with Armen Bedroussian and Junghoon Ki
Read the Article: Sunshine State Has Best US Job Markets
Want to know why President Bush won Florida? Political pundits might want to look at the Milken Institute’s 2004 Best Performing Cities Index.
Led by the Fort Myers-Cape Coral metro area, a burgeoning retirement and tourist destination on the state’s southwest coast, Florida landed seven metros in the top 20 on this year’s ranking, including five in the top 10. The others are West Pa lm Beach-Boca Raton (4th), Daytona Beach (5th), Sarasota-Bradenton (6th), Fort Lauderdale (9th), Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater (12th) and Naples (15th).
Their strong showing on the Institute’s annual survey of where America’s jobs are being created shows that Florida’s economy has been creating new jobs at a brisk pace, the result of a rebounding U.S. economy, the return of tourists, low housing costs and a growing elderly population that has fueled job growth in health care and other services.
Other metros also benefited from these trends, including Las Vegas (2nd), Riverside-San Bernardino, Calif. (8th) and Boise, Idaho (13th). Another trend that benefited some cities is the increase in defense spending since 9/11. Metros with significant defense industries and military bases that did well on the ranking include Phoenix-Mesa, Ariz., Portland, Maine (14th) and Tucson (17th).
The top 10 (with 2003 ranking in parentheses):
1. Fort Myers-Cape Coral, FL (3)
2. Las Vegas, NV (2)
3. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ (43)
4. West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL (4)
5. Daytona Beach, FL (116)
6. Sarasota-Bradenton, FL (41)
7. Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, Ark. (1)
8. Riverside-San Bernardino, CA (20)
9. Fort Lauderdale, FL (29)
10. Monmouth-Ocean, NJ (10)
The index ranks U.S. metros based on their ability to create and sustain jobs. It includes both long-term (five years) and short-term (one year) measurements of employment and salary growth. There are also four measurements of technology output growth, which are included because of tech’s crucial role in regional economic growth.
In past years, technology-oriented metros dominated the top of the ranking. Last year, however, after the decline of America’s high-tech sector, the top-ranked cities were those with low costs, growing populations, and reliable and stable sectors such as health care and government.
This year’s ranking reflects some of that, but it also
shows the rebound of the U.S. economy. A common attribute
among this year’s top-ranked metros is a growing services
sector, such as tourism, health care and home construction.
This can be attributed, in part, to growing populations, low
housing costs and an increase in well-to-do elderly
residents.
The Institute also ranks the 118 smallest metros on a separate list. The top five are: 1) Missoula, Mont., 2) Las Cruces, N.M., 3) Santa Fe, N.M., 4) Dover, Del., and 5) Casper, Wyo.
Of the top 10 most-populous U.S. metros, Washington (which includes parts of D.C., Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia) scored highest, placing 11th on this year’s Index, followed by Atlanta (72nd), Philadelphia (84th), Houston (104th) and Dallas (114th).